On 26 March 2019, the European Parliament approved the EU Copyright Directive.

What happens next?

Member states will have two years to implement the directive at a national level once adopted.

The news will not please the large online content aggregators which have been extensively lobbying against the implementation of the Copyright Directive. The controversial Article 13 (the so-called “Meme Ban”) has been one of the main reasons for the aggregators’ objections because it is argued that Article 13 encourages censorship and impedes internet freedom.

For an overview of the also controversial so called ‘Link Tax’ (Article 11) see our prior blog post.


Continue Reading

On 26 March 2019, the European Parliament approved the EU Copyright Directive.

Article 11 of the revised EU Copyright directive prohibits online content providers from linking to news outlets/publications without the prior authority of the publisher – the so called “Link Tax”. This means that for an online content provider to be able to link to a news article on their site, it will need a licence from the publisher. It may also need to pay for the right to use the article (unless the publisher waives this right).

What is the aim behind Article 11?

Article 11 improves the bargaining position for publishers. Currently, online content providers are permitted to freely link to news articles on their websites without the publisher’s prior consent and without providing remuneration to the publisher for use of its publication. Article 11 seeks to level the playing field between publishers and online content providers. Publishers will become entitled to negotiate fair licensing agreements and remuneration for use of their works online.


Continue Reading

on 26 March 2019 the European Parliament approved the draft EU Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive. The copyright reforms have sparked large scale controversy amongst the tech giant community, condemning the reforms as impractical and burdensome. Whereas many (not all) authors and members of the performing artist industry have welcomed such proposals, favouring fairer protection and remuneration for their works.

What is the purpose of the Directive?

Digital technology has changed the way content is reproduced and accessed. Content is now largely accessed via online platforms such as Google, YouTube or Facebook. The aim of the Copyright Directive is to modernise the current copyright rules in line with an ever growing digital world where content is predominately accessed online.


Continue Reading

Data-driven technologies, particularly artificial intelligence and other complex algorithms, have the potential to enhance patient care and catalyse medical breakthroughs. However, these technologies are heavily reliant on data, which poses challenges in ensuring that patient information is handled in a safe, secure and legally compliant way.
Continue Reading

In today’s judgment, the UK Supreme Court held that rights-holders should bear the costs of implementing website blocking injunctions to prevent IP infringement. The judgment overturns the practice adopted by the English courts since 2011 of requiring internet service providers, as innocent intermediaries, to bear these costs.

Continue Reading

A recent judgment of the European Court makes it clear that in many circumstances more than one party may be a joint data controller. Whilst the judgment pre-dates the GDPR, its consideration of what constitutes ‘control’ and ‘joint control’ remains good law under the GDPR. The judgment means that parties who may have considered themselves ‘data processors’ in the past should review whether they are in fact ‘joint data controllers’ with others.
Continue Reading

On 13 September 2017, the Commission issued a proposal for a Regulation to strengthen the role of the EU Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) by:

  • granting it a permanent mandate;
  • clarifying its role as the information hub of the EU for cybersecurity; and
  • tasking it with the responsibility of proactively contributing to policy in the area of network information and security.

The proposal also introduces EU-wide cybersecurity certification schemes for ICT products and services, which will be prepared by ENISA. This aims to address current market fragmentation and provide a comprehensive set of cybersecurity rules, technical requirements, standards and procedures.
Continue Reading

In a judgment delivered on 14 June 2017, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) decided that making available a online sharing platform falls within the concept of “communication to the public” for the purposes of copyright law, and can therefore amount to infringement of copyright in protected works which are shared via that platform. This decision bolsters the ability of copyright owners to pursue the operators of such platforms, and to obtain relief against intermediaries (in particular ISPs) forcing them to block their users from accessing such platforms.

The immediate practical consequence of the CJEU’s decision is that the national courts are entitled to grant blocking injunctions against ISPs in order to block users from accessing TPB. This is plainly a positive outcome from the point of view of copyright holders, giving them stronger rights to restrict unauthorised distribution of their protected works. The generally pro-rightsholder approach of the CJEU in this case mirrors the recent efforts of the English courts to modernise its remedies in order to secure adequate protection against infringing activities, as reported in a previous blog post.


Continue Reading

On May 23, 2017, the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) released the text of a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) that solicits public comment on what FCC Chairman Ajit Pai calls a plan for “Restoring Internet Freedom.” The NPRM contemplates reversing the 2015 FCC Open Internet Order that classified both fixed and mobile broadband internet access services as telecommunications services and subjected them to some of the common carrier regulations found in Title II of the Communications Act. The 2015 Order also adopted no-blocking, no-throttling, and no-paid-prioritization rules, as well as a general internet conduct standard.
Continue Reading